A New Approach for Acquiring Skills Towards Undergraduate Research: A Progress Review
Abstract
In recent years, a gradual transition from passive teaching to active learning has intensified in higher education. Critical thinking and deep learning is promoted, as opposed to surface learning. The Teaching Excellence Framework guidance for higher education associates learning with research, thus research skills acquisition is fundamental. An innovative collaborative research project, leading to individually composed assignments, was implemented in a research methodology module, aiming at developing an undergraduate research skill set and writing performance. The results were satisfactory showing positive student response to the newly implemented approach. Critical thinking, deep learning, autonomy, peer-support and collaboration are mostly what the undergraduate students can benefited from, through this innovative learning approach.
References
Almarghani, E. and Mijatovic, I. (2017). Factors affecting student engagement in HEIs - it is all about good teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(8): 940-956.
Behar-Horenstein, L., Mitchell, G. and Dolan, T. (2005). A case study examining classroom instructional practices at a U.S. dental school. Journal of Dental Education, 69(6): 639-648.
Bohaty, B., Redford, G. and Gadbury-Amyot, C. (2016). Flipping the classroom: Assessment of strategies to promote studentcentered, self-directed learning in a dental school course in pediatric dentistry. Journal of Dental Education, 80(11): 1319-1327.
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (2015). Fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. Green Paper, cm 9141. London, UK: BIS.
Liu, J., Pysarchik, D. and Taylor, W. (2002). Peer review in the classroom. BioScience, 52(9): 824-829.
Lujan, H. and DiCarlo, S. (2006). Too much teaching, not enough learning: What is the solution? Advances in Physiology Education, 30(1): 17-22.
Murdoch-Eaton, D., Drewery, S., Elton, S., Emmerson, C., Marshall, M., Smith, J., Stark, P. and Whittle, S. (2010). What do medical students understand by research and research skills? Identifying research opportunities within undergraduate projects. Medical Teacher, 32(3): e152-e160.
Ofstad, W. and Brunner, L. (2013). Team-based learning in pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(4), Article 70.
Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. (2005). Subject benchmark statement: Health care programmes. Gloucester, UK:
Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. Rahman, S., Yasin, R., Salamuddin, N. and Surat, S. (2014). The use of metacognitive strategies to develop research skills among postgraduate students. Asian Social Science, 10(19): 271-275.
Scouller, K. (1998). The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35(4): 453-472.
Tsaushu, M., Tal, T., Sagy, O., Kali, Y., Gepstein, S. and Zilberstein, D. (2012). Peer learning and support of technology in an undergraduate biology course to enhance deep learning. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 11(4): 402-412.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
