Three Stages of Student Engagement in a Flipped-classroom Environment

Keywords: Engagement, Evidence-based, Flipped-classroom, Interactions, Learning spaces

Abstract

The literature suggests that students tend to prefer in-person lectures to video lectures. This paper identifies potential causes of this phenomenon and triggers of student engagement in a flipped-classroom environment.

Eight short in-house mathematics videos were prepared and made available to foundation engineering students on the university’s virtual learning environment, prior to each topic being discussed in class. The in-house videos were viewed more than accompanying external on-line video lectures for all topics covered. Students preferred in-house videos with a voice describing a drawing as it is being drawn, not one drawn earlier, and an equation as it is being written, not one written earlier. In-house videos that were produced using high numbers of pre-prepared pages tended to be viewed less. These findings suggest a gradient of student engagement from the external on-line video lecture to the interactive group learning experience. Three evidence-based stages of student engagement are proposed: (1) external video, (2) in-house video with high numbers of pre-prepared pages and (3) in-house video with low numbers of pre-prepared pages. Further validation of these stages of student engagement, and an exploration of lecturer preparedness and social presence during the production of short in-house mathematics videos, is recommended.

References

Archer, M. S. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Barr, R. B. and Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning – A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27 (6): 13–25.

Bergmann, J. and Sams, A., (2014). Flipped learning: Gateway to student engagement. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.

Bishop, J. L. and Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. ASEE National Conference Proceedings, 30: 1-18.

Day, J. A. and Foley, J. D. (2006). Evaluating a web lecture intervention in a human–computer interaction course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49: 420–431.

Dewey, J. (1938). Education and experience. New York, NY: Collier Books.

Fulton, K. (2012). Upside down and inside out: Flip your classroom to improve student learning. Learning and Leading with Technology, 39: 12-17.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T. and Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text- based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2: 87-105.

Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1: 147–166.

Kahn, P., Everington, L., Kelm, K., Reid, I. and Watkins, F. (2017). Understanding student engagement in online learning environments: the role of reflexivity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65: 203–218.

Krause, K. L., and Coates, H. (2008). Students’ engagement in first-year university. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33: 493–505.

Lam, J. (2015). Autonomy presence in the extended community of inquiry. International Journal of Continuing Education and Lifelong Learning, 81(1), 39-61.

Milman, N. B. (2012). The flipped classroom strategy: What is it and how can it best be used? Distance Learning, 9: 85-87.

National Survey of Student Engagement (2017). Engagement indicators and high-impact practices. Annual results 2017. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.

Short, J. A., Williams, E., and Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London, UK: Wiley.

Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom: Online instruction at home frees class time for learning. Education Next, 12: 82-83.

Williamson, B. (2015). A five-cycle living visual taxonomy of learning interactions. Educational Journal of Living Theories, 8: 100-133.

Published
2018-12-20
How to Cite
Williamson, B. (2018). Three Stages of Student Engagement in a Flipped-classroom Environment. Journal of Learning and Student Experience, 1, Article 2. Retrieved from https://jolase.bolton.ac.uk/index.php/jolae/article/view/16
Section
Research Articles